Understand policy risk. Ask policy questions in plain language. Request a demo →

Published:

Did You Know? Automate Rule Documentation with FireMon

FireMon Security Manager turns consistently formatted firewall rule comments into structured, searchable rule documentation during policy retrieval.

by FireMon

A firewall rule can tell you which traffic it matches and what action it takes. It usually can't tell you who still needs that access, why it was approved, or which change request authorized it. When those details live only in a ticket or someone's memory, even a routine rule review turns into an investigation.

FireMon Security Manager has a lesser-known feature that makes that context easier to find: auto-documentation. If your team uses a consistent format in firewall rule comments, FireMon can read those comments when it retrieves the policy and populate corresponding rule documentation fields. That saves administrators from entering the same information again, rule by rule.

Turn a rule comment into fields you can use

Suppose an engineer adds this comment to a firewall rule in the device administration tool:

own: Payments Team; ccn: CHG-4821; jst: Approved connection for payment processing;

FireMon's default match patterns can recognize own, ccn, and jst as the owner, change control number, and business justification. When Security Manager retrieves the policy, it associates the matched values with that rule as structured documentation. FireMon runs auto-documentation as part of each policy revision it processes. The example is illustrative; the values must match the patterns configured in your environment.

That distinction matters. A free-text comment is useful when you're already looking at the rule. Structured fields let you filter and search across rules to answer questions such as: Which rules belong to the Payments Team? Which ones are tied to a particular change number? Which rules are missing a business justification? Security Manager makes matched documentation fields available in its filters and SIQL searches when filtering is enabled.

Rule documentation stays associated with the rule independently of its rule number or revisions. If the rule's position changes in the policy, its documented context doesn't depend on that position.

Start with one repeatable workflow

You don't need to document every rule at once. A practical starting point is a small set of new or recently changed rules:

  1. Choose the fields that matter. Owner, change control number, and business justification are useful starting points. Expiration dates may also be valuable for temporary access.
  2. Check the match patterns. In Administration, review the Rule Documentation fields and the patterns that extract values from comments. FireMon provides default patterns, and administrators can configure additional fields where needed.
  3. Use the agreed format in rule comments. Ask engineers to enter the field markers and values consistently in their device administration tool. Confirm that the device or management station retains those comments and that your team can retrieve them.
  4. Inspect the result after retrieval. Open a sample rule in Security Manager and check its Rule Documentation. Then filter or search for the owner or change number to make sure the information is usable beyond that single rule.

The goal is a reliable handoff from the change process to the rule record. When an engineer has to decide whether an old exception is still needed, the owner and original reason are already attached to the rule. When a reviewer needs to trace a rule back to an approved change, the change number is available in the policy view. Documented next review dates can also support reports that identify rules due for review.

Keep the human checks in place

Auto-documentation extracts information that your team provides. It doesn't determine whether a business justification is still valid or whether a named owner is still responsible. Agree on who maintains the source comments, and review the populated fields as part of your normal change and recertification process.

If you customize a match pattern, test it before using it broadly. Start with a small sample of comments and confirm the results before extending the format across devices.

For firewall administrators, this is a modest change with a useful payoff: context entered during a change becomes searchable rule documentation during ongoing policy management. That makes it easier to investigate access, review aging rules, and explain why a rule exists without rebuilding its history from scratch.

Explore FireMon Security Manager to see how searchable rule documentation can make firewall policy reviews easier.

[ FAQs ]

Frequen­tly Asked Questions

Yes. FireMon Security Manager can populate rule documentation fields from firewall rule comments when engineers use a consistent format that matches the configured match patterns. When Security Manager retrieves a policy, it reads the comments and associates matched values with each rule as structured documentation. Auto-documentation runs as part of each policy revision FireMon processes, so administrators don't re-enter the same details rule by rule.

FireMon's default match patterns can recognize the markers own, ccn, and jst as the rule owner, change control number, and business justification. For example, a comment written as own: Payments Team; ccn: CHG-4821; jst: Approved connection for payment processing; would map to those three fields. The example is illustrative. Values must match the patterns configured in your environment, and administrators can configure additional fields.

Agree on a consistent comment format, then let a tool extract it. With FireMon Security Manager, engineers enter field markers and values in their device administration tool, and Security Manager converts matched values into rule documentation during policy retrieval. Matched fields then become available in Security Manager filters and SIQL searches when filtering is enabled, so teams can query across rules instead of reading them one by one.

A free-text comment is useful when you're already looking at one rule. Structured rule documentation turns the same details into fields you can filter and search across many rules. In FireMon Security Manager, that means answering questions such as which rules belong to a given owner, which ones tie to a specific change number, and which rules are missing a business justification.

Test with a small sample first. Review the Rule Documentation fields and match patterns in FireMon Administration, add correctly formatted comments to a few new or recently changed rules, and confirm the device or management station retains those comments. After retrieval, open a sample rule in Security Manager, check its Rule Documentation, then search for the owner or change number. Test any customized pattern before broad use.

Auto-documentation extracts what your team writes. It doesn't judge whether that information is still true. FireMon Security Manager doesn't determine whether a business justification is still valid or whether a named owner is still responsible. Teams should agree on who maintains the source comments and review the populated fields during their normal change and recertification process, especially for older exceptions and temporary access.

Yes. In FireMon Security Manager, rule documentation stays associated with the rule independently of its rule number or revisions. If a rule moves within the policy, its documented owner, change number, and justification don't depend on that position. That keeps the original context attached when reviewers trace a rule back to an approved change or decide whether an old exception is still needed.

Automated Rule Documentation in FireMon Security Manager