Get to know us better! Gain valuable insights into how we think by visiting our blog, or take a look at the industry events we're frequenting on our events page. You can also geek out with us by attending one of our security management webinars, or dive head first into the products and solutions we provide in our Resource Library. There's lots to keep you busy!
My years of experience managing security programs, across a broad spectrum of industries, has given me a greater understanding of how technology and people both play a critical role in influencing the overall security posture of any organization.
Over at Krebs on Security, a rare but fascinating look into the monetary and brand reputation effects a real-world breach can have on a corporation were outlined last week in the fascinating post “FDIC: 2011 FIS Breach Worse Than Reported“. The post provides an in-depth review of the impact of the 2011 breach at FIS in which FIS originally stated ““7,170 prepaid accounts may have been at risk and that three individual cardholders’ non-public information may have been disclosed as a result of the unauthorized activities” in their original filing with the SEC. The article provided two very interesting insights. First, there are truly real-word financial and brand consequences in failing to effectively implement network security controls. Kreb’s article provides an in-depth look at the results of the FDIC audits performed at FIS in 2011 and 2012 as a result of the original breach incident. What was interesting to learn is that as FIS is a service provider to banks and not actually a bank, the FDIC is unable to levy fines against it or shut it down directly. However, in May of this year, the FDIC sent the results of its audits to all of FIS’s customers, as the post highlights with a letter attached that began “We are sending you this report for your evaluation and consideration in managing your vendor relationship with FIS.” The FDIC made this decision despite the fact that FIS has spent over $100 million dollars in trying to shore up their network security controls. This will obviously have some negative brand and revenue impact for FIS as the result of the FDIC actions.
The second interesting point within the post was the details around the environment FIS was attempting to secure, and the amount of vulnerabilities they were dealing with. Portions of the FDIC report that were noted in the post showed that FIS was dealing with “approximately 30,000 servers and operating systems, another 30,000 network devices, over 40,000 workstations, 50,000 network circuits, and 28 mainframes running 80 LPARs”. The post also highlights that “The Executive Summary Scan reports from November 2012 show 18,747 network vulnerabilities and over 291 application vulnerabilities as past due”. While 18,747 vulnerabilities identified in a scan might seem like a lot, it is not uncommon in a network of this size and scope. Many FireMon customers have seen scan results with an even greater amount of identified vulnerabilities. The challenge when faced with this amount of vulnerabilities is knowing which ones truly matter. Out of 18,000+ vulnerabilities, how would you know which ones to remediate first? Attempting to manually sort through the vulnerabilities or simply patching the highest value assets doesn’t actually solve the problem. An automated, intelligent and continuous real-time assessment of the vulnerabilities that shows what assets are truly reachable over the network by an attacker, and which remediation efforts will reduce the greatest amount risk (and access) is the only way to proactively solve this problem.
So you’ve purchased a new firewall. Now what?
You’ve got to decide which access is allowed, which isn’t allowed and whether or not rules are compliant with internal and regulatory standards.
Things are running along smoothly and then the dreaded “change.” A user submits a new access request and the fun begins. Is this access necessary? Safe? Compliant? And what happens when it’s time to retire unused rules?
How Effective Security Management Can Help Teams Cover the Exponentially Increasing Gap between Technology & the Resources Available to Manage It
Security teams today are under tremendous pressure due to the rising frequency and impact of breaches and a business that wants to move faster and faster. The answer to both of these challenges has always been to add more technology and staff resources.
However, each new technology added creates complexity. More rules are created and more data is generated. As networks continue to evolve, this complexity will only grow. And while staff resources may increase, they will never match the exponential growth of technology.
FireMon calls this phenomenon The Complexity Gap and has set out to help security teams close it.
Join us for this webinar with Frost & Sullivan where we’ll explore the causes of “The Gap” and how workforce multipliers such as intelligence and automation help staff manage their security more efficiently and more effectively.
En la actualidad, uno de los retos principales es preparar las redes de seguridad, no sólo para enfrentar las amenazas, sino también para enfrentar los cumplimientos. El día 26 de enero se publicó en el Diario Oficial la LEY GENERAL DE PROTECCIÓN DE DATOS PERSONALES EN POSESIÓN DE SUJETOS OBLIGADOS.
¿Está tu red preparada?
¿Cuentas con los procesos necesarios para el cumplimiento?
En esta era digital los datos personales de nuestros clientes y proveedores pasan por una red y se almacenan en una base de datos. Éstos, por ley, deben protegerse por medio de sistemas y procesos. Uno de los objetivos de esta ley es establecer las condiciones de tratamiento de datos personales y fomentar la cultura de protección.
La Ley de protección de datos es mucho más que un simple aviso de privacidad; esta ley describe derechos y obligaciones que de incumplirse pueden ser penalizados. Asiste a este Webinar para conocer más y prepararte. Te mostraremos:
In the fall of 2016, we sought the answer to a very simple question: What benefits do users who have a firewall management tool deployed with their firewalls see over nonusers? To find out, we commissioned Forrester Consulting to survey 188 IT security decision makers.
In their study, “Automate Zero Trust Policy & Enforcement,” Forrester Consulting found that organizations with firewall auditing and configuration tools realize more benefits that those without, including:
In this webinar, guest Speaker Josh Zelonis, Senior Analyst with Forrester, will review and discuss the results of the study with FireMon CTO Paul Calatayud who will bring his own experiences and best practices for deploying firewall management tools to improve productivity and reduce risk.
Helping Enterprise Security Teams Improve Resource Efficiency & Reduce Overall Risk Exposure
Firewall technology has come a long way since its initial, most rudimentary forms. Next-Generation Firewalls (NGFW) are the latest development, and organizations are accelerating adoption to the new technology. But NGFWs aren’t a fix-all solution.