Get to know us better! Gain valuable insights into how we think by visiting our blog, or take a look at the industry events we're frequenting on our events page. You can also geek out with us by attending one of our security management webinars, or dive head first into the products and solutions we provide in our Resource Library. There's lots to keep you busy!
My years of experience managing security programs, across a broad spectrum of industries, has given me a greater understanding of how technology and people both play a critical role in influencing the overall security posture of any organization.
Roger Grimes and I have engaged in a very interesting conversation around the necessity and value of firewalls. Yesterday I took issue in my blog post with Roger's initial claim that the firewall is dead. In response, Roger continues his argument in his post, The Firestorm over Firewalls.
Roger seems to have capitulated the argument on ineffective management and instead doubled down on two core points:
I still take significant issue with the argument that 99% of all attacks are client-side and Roger's proof that anti-virus vendors block a lot of stuff is not compelling to me. Remember firewalls block a lot of stuff too with billions of logs of dropped traffic generated every second world-wide. Neither of these points is sufficient to make or dispel the 99% claim. The Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report I referenced is also not perfect, as Roger points out, as it only covers a minority of all attacks worldwide. But it is the best source I am aware of, so I think it is still worth referencing. And pointing to a sample graphic ( on page 8 ) meant to describe a documentation standard as proof that client-side attacks are responsible for all breaches is not very compelling either. Especially since it was not written to support this point in any way. However, even if we do acknowledge Roger's proof graphic on page 8, take a look a the paragraph describing it that claims an egress filter (firewall) could have prevented the breach and it seems to dispel Roger's obituary of the firewall.
But let's set statistics aside. I imagine there are plenty of other people who can more credibly respond to Roger's unsubstantiated claim about 99% of attacks are client-side. And, I don't mean to argue that client-side attacks are not an issue, I simply mean to claim they are not the only issue.
Instead, I would like to hypothetically accept Roger's postion that 99% of all successful attacks are client-side. I would argue this change in attack vectors through the years strengthens the case that a well-configured firewall is an effective security control. It is a matter of attackers coming in through the open window instead of the closed door. The growth in client-side attacks suggest the direct attack is being successfully thwarted by the firewall and less effective solutions are being exploited.
The great thing about a firewall is that it employs a positive security model where only what you decide to allow is permitted and everything else is denied. When managed well, it makes it a great security solution. In contrast, malware detection and anti-virus software employ a negative security model where everything is allowed and only known bad attacks are denied. This creates a horrible cat and mouse game that the attackers seem adept at winning by staying a step ahead of the latest signatures. Which begs the question, if Roger's argument is that client-side attacks are the real problem and the fact that we still have security problems is justification to kill a technology, why does he pick on the firewall. Shouldn't he instead have called anti-virus or anti-malware or some other client-side technology dead instead? The firewall, according the Roger's own logic, is the one technology in the game that is working.
The firewall isn't dead. In fact, I think Roger's arguments strengthen the case the firewalls are working. Are they perfect, no. Are they sufficient to solve all the security problems, no. Should we get rid of them because they are not perfect, NO!
And this gets to the heart of the matter: the fact that there remain security issues in information technology is not a matter of one technology working or not. It is not justification to call an effective technology dead because it doesn't solve everything. When effectively managed, the firewall is a very effective security solution. Additional capabilities in NG Firewall technology continue to make it a relevant and central part of a security solution. It should not be considered THE solution, but it certainly shouldn't be discounted either.
So you’ve purchased a new firewall. Now what?
You’ve got to decide which access is allowed, which isn’t allowed and whether or not rules are compliant with internal and regulatory standards.
Things are running along smoothly and then the dreaded “change.” A user submits a new access request and the fun begins. Is this access necessary? Safe? Compliant? And what happens when it’s time to retire unused rules?
How Effective Security Management Can Help Teams Cover the Exponentially Increasing Gap between Technology & the Resources Available to Manage It
Security teams today are under tremendous pressure due to the rising frequency and impact of breaches and a business that wants to move faster and faster. The answer to both of these challenges has always been to add more technology and staff resources.
However, each new technology added creates complexity. More rules are created and more data is generated. As networks continue to evolve, this complexity will only grow. And while staff resources may increase, they will never match the exponential growth of technology.
FireMon calls this phenomenon The Complexity Gap and has set out to help security teams close it.
Join us for this webinar with Frost & Sullivan where we’ll explore the causes of “The Gap” and how workforce multipliers such as intelligence and automation help staff manage their security more efficiently and more effectively.
En la actualidad, uno de los retos principales es preparar las redes de seguridad, no sólo para enfrentar las amenazas, sino también para enfrentar los cumplimientos. El día 26 de enero se publicó en el Diario Oficial la LEY GENERAL DE PROTECCIÓN DE DATOS PERSONALES EN POSESIÓN DE SUJETOS OBLIGADOS.
¿Está tu red preparada?
¿Cuentas con los procesos necesarios para el cumplimiento?
En esta era digital los datos personales de nuestros clientes y proveedores pasan por una red y se almacenan en una base de datos. Éstos, por ley, deben protegerse por medio de sistemas y procesos. Uno de los objetivos de esta ley es establecer las condiciones de tratamiento de datos personales y fomentar la cultura de protección.
La Ley de protección de datos es mucho más que un simple aviso de privacidad; esta ley describe derechos y obligaciones que de incumplirse pueden ser penalizados. Asiste a este Webinar para conocer más y prepararte. Te mostraremos:
In the fall of 2016, we sought the answer to a very simple question: What benefits do users who have a firewall management tool deployed with their firewalls see over nonusers? To find out, we commissioned Forrester Consulting to survey 188 IT security decision makers.
In their study, “Automate Zero Trust Policy & Enforcement,” Forrester Consulting found that organizations with firewall auditing and configuration tools realize more benefits that those without, including:
In this webinar, guest Speaker Josh Zelonis, Senior Analyst with Forrester, will review and discuss the results of the study with FireMon CTO Paul Calatayud who will bring his own experiences and best practices for deploying firewall management tools to improve productivity and reduce risk.
Helping Enterprise Security Teams Improve Resource Efficiency & Reduce Overall Risk Exposure
Firewall technology has come a long way since its initial, most rudimentary forms. Next-Generation Firewalls (NGFW) are the latest development, and organizations are accelerating adoption to the new technology. But NGFWs aren’t a fix-all solution.