FireMon Security Manager 7.0 – Top 5 Additions




With any major product release there’s typically quite a bit to sound off about, but with the launch of FireMon Security Manager 7.0 platform and the introduction of its updated Policy Planner 3.0 module there’s so much to highlight that one could potentially go on for a long time.

So, in the interest of shedding some light on the most exciting and breakthrough additions in these new releases, let’s take a classic “Late Show”-style approach citing the “Top 5 New Capabilities of Security Manager 7.0”:

1. True Continuous Assessment: The Security Manager analysis engine and supporting features are the only solution that truly provide real-time visibility across all network security device infrastructure. With even greater levels of automation including an updated library of proven assessments, proactive “what-if” change modeling, historical trend analysis to chart improving performance and the scalability to analyze enterprise infrastructure in seconds, FireMon has once again upped the ante.

2. Expanded Assessment and Controls: Striking at the lifeblood of how customers benefit from Security Manager’s automated assessment approach, the 7.0 release introduces major advancement including trending, whitelisting and an out-of-the-box library with over 100 pre-built controls and Best Practices assessments. The results? Faster analysis, greater policy and process retention and even greater ease-of-use – all with a high degree of customization – based on FireMon’s years of experience working with customers.

3. Standardized Policy Workflow: Policy Planner 3.0 delivers full support for the BPMN 2.0 workflow standard, allowing even more consistent policy design, evolution and management, and allowing direct integration with existing BPM systems and processes. More fuel to the FireMon flame of providing enterprise ready, time saving and closed-loop methodology; look here to see who else supports BPMN 2.0.

4. Added MSSP capabilities: While other vendors merely pass off their solutions to MSSPs, FireMon continues to add purpose-build capabilities for our many managed service provider customers, including support for organizational domains and LDAP authorization. Instead of handing-off an existing solution and merely saying good luck, FireMon continues to make the investments that drive increased ROI for MSSPs of all kinds.

5. New Device Support: The more network security devices that Security Manager provides direct integration with, the more powerful the results. This time around additions include newly released products from leading providers including Cisco (ASA 9.1), Palo Alto Networks (Panorama) and Qualys (QualysGuard VM) as well as support for device infrastructure popular in APAC (AhnLabs, Hillstone, Huawei, SECUI) and other regions, making the FireMon platform the most truly comprehensive and globally relevant on the market.

So there you have it, and honestly that’s just a quick peek at all of the extraordinary goodness and highly differentiated capabilities delivered in the FireMon Security Manager 7.0 platform. There’s no other product available that spans the full gamut of assessment and reporting needs required by today’s enterprise organizations and large government agencies.

Am I biased? Sure, but I’ve also been around this market long enough to know who is stretching the truth and how FireMon can truly back all its claims.

If you’re unwilling to take my word for it, why not sign up for a demo of FireMon Security Manager 7.0 today and you see how well it works for yourself.

FireMon Security Manager 7.0 – Top 5 Additions




With any major product release there’s typically quite a bit to sound off about, but with the launch of FireMon Security Manager 7.0 platform and the introduction of its updated Policy Planner 3.0 module there’s so much to highlight that one could potentially go on for a long time.

So, in the interest of shedding some light on the most exciting and breakthrough additions in these new releases, let’s take a classic “Late Show”-style approach citing the “Top 5 New Capabilities of Security Manager 7.0”:

1. True Continuous Assessment: The Security Manager analysis engine and supporting features are the only solution that truly provide real-time visibility across all network security device infrastructure. With even greater levels of automation including an updated library of proven assessments, proactive “what-if” change modeling, historical trend analysis to chart improving performance and the scalability to analyze enterprise infrastructure in seconds, FireMon has once again upped the ante.

2. Expanded Assessment and Controls: Striking at the lifeblood of how customers benefit from Security Manager’s automated assessment approach, the 7.0 release introduces major advancement including trending, whitelisting and an out-of-the-box library with over 100 pre-built controls and Best Practices assessments. The results? Faster analysis, greater policy and process retention and even greater ease-of-use – all with a high degree of customization – based on FireMon’s years of experience working with customers.

3. Standardized Policy Workflow: Policy Planner 3.0 delivers full support for the BPMN 2.0 workflow standard, allowing even more consistent policy design, evolution and management, and allowing direct integration with existing BPM systems and processes. More fuel to the FireMon flame of providing enterprise ready, time saving and closed-loop methodology; look here to see who else supports BPMN 2.0.

4. Added MSSP capabilities: While other vendors merely pass off their solutions to MSSPs, FireMon continues to add purpose-build capabilities for our many managed service provider customers, including support for organizational domains and LDAP authorization. Instead of handing-off an existing solution and merely saying good luck, FireMon continues to make the investments that drive increased ROI for MSSPs of all kinds.

5. New Device Support: The more network security devices that Security Manager provides direct integration with, the more powerful the results. This time around additions include newly released products from leading providers including Cisco (ASA 9.1), Palo Alto Networks (Panorama) and Qualys (QualysGuard VM) as well as support for device infrastructure popular in APAC (AhnLabs, Hillstone, Huawei, SECUI) and other regions, making the FireMon platform the most truly comprehensive and globally relevant on the market.

So there you have it, and honestly that’s just a quick peek at all of the extraordinary goodness and highly differentiated capabilities delivered in the FireMon Security Manager 7.0 platform. There’s no other product available that spans the full gamut of assessment and reporting needs required by today’s enterprise organizations and large government agencies.

Am I biased? Sure, but I’ve also been around this market long enough to know who is stretching the truth and how FireMon can truly back all its claims.

If you’re unwilling to take my word for it, why not sign up for a demo of FireMon Security Manager 7.0 today and you see how well it works for yourself.

Real-World Breach Shows Prioritizing Vulnerabilities Matters




Over at Krebs on Security, a rare but fascinating look into the monetary and brand reputation effects a real-world breach can have on a corporation were outlined last week in the fascinating post “FDIC: 2011 FIS Breach Worse Than Reported“. The post provides an in-depth review of the impact of the 2011 breach at FIS in which FIS originally stated ““7,170 prepaid accounts may have been at risk and that three individual cardholders’ non-public information may have been disclosed as a result of the unauthorized activities” in their original filing with the SEC. The article provided two very interesting insights. First, there are truly real-word financial and brand consequences in failing to effectively implement network security controls. Kreb’s article provides an in-depth look at the results of the FDIC audits performed at FIS in 2011 and 2012 as a result of the original breach incident. What was interesting to learn is that as FIS is a service provider to banks and not actually a bank, the FDIC is unable to levy fines against it or shut it down directly. However, in May of this year, the FDIC sent the results of its audits to all of FIS’s customers, as the post highlights with a letter attached that began “We are sending you this report for your evaluation and consideration in managing your vendor relationship with FIS.” The FDIC made this decision despite the fact that FIS has spent over $100 million dollars in trying to shore up their network security controls. This will obviously have some negative brand and revenue impact for FIS as the result of the FDIC actions.

The second interesting point within the post was the details around the environment FIS was attempting to secure, and the amount of vulnerabilities they were dealing with. Portions of the FDIC report that were noted in the post showed that FIS was dealing with “approximately 30,000 servers and operating systems, another 30,000 network devices, over 40,000 workstations, 50,000 network circuits, and 28 mainframes running 80 LPARs”. The post also highlights that “The Executive Summary Scan reports from November 2012 show 18,747 network vulnerabilities and over 291 application vulnerabilities as past due”. While 18,747 vulnerabilities identified in a scan might seem like a lot, it is not uncommon in a network of this size and scope. Many FireMon customers have seen scan results with an even greater amount of identified vulnerabilities. The challenge when faced with this amount of vulnerabilities is knowing which ones truly matter. Out of 18,000+ vulnerabilities, how would you know which ones to remediate first? Attempting to manually sort through the vulnerabilities or simply patching the highest value assets doesn’t actually solve the problem. An automated, intelligent and continuous real-time assessment of the vulnerabilities that shows what assets are truly reachable over the network by an attacker, and which remediation efforts will reduce the greatest amount risk (and access)  is the only way to proactively solve this problem.

Former Federal IT Execs: A Risk Based Approach to Security Needed




A Federal Times article recently noted that three former Federal IT Executives, including two high ranking IT security officials from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), felt that government IT security was too focused on compliance and “oftentimes do not reflect their agencies’ most critical security needs”. In a new report entitled “Measuring What Matters: Reducing Risk by Rethinking How We Evaluate Cybersecurity”, the authors note that government agencies “continue to spend scarce resources on measures that do little to address the most significant cyber threats.”

The report outlines the authors proposal for a new approach to security, the Organization Cyber Risk Management Framework. This is a risk-centric security management posture that focuses on establishing a security baseline for agencies that allows them to correctly asses their risk posture based on empirical data. The authors note that in order to move to this framework, agencies must first implement automated continuous monitoring programs, which they identify as “continuous diagnostics and mitigation, configuration management, threat assessment, and remediation practices.” We at FireMon could not be more excited to see the report identify the importance of configuration management, and we have highlighted the importance of configuration management as it relates to risk on this blog previously. When discussing a risk-based approach, security practitioners tend to gravitate to threat management. Threat management is sexy; it includes attacks and attackers, and makes security practitioners feel more like MacGyver vs. Dilbert. Configuration Management on the surface seems less sexy. Getting notification that someone added a new ACL to a router doesn’t invoke images of thwarting a hackers attack. Consider the all to common scenario though where the router admin fat-fingered said ACL, and accidentally enabled access to an internal network that should not have access from the outside world. Without real-time configuration change alerting that can identify a violation of agency or corporate security policy, an attacker might end up being the one that ultimately alerts the organization to the misconfiguration.

The report is very comprehensive, and provides a very through framework for how to implement a risk based security practice. While it is clearly focused on Federal Government agency environments, it provides some good insights for corporate security practitioners as well. The report concludes that “To fix the problems of today and those of the years ahead, government should implement a more consistent method of evaluating cybersecurity threats — one which is measurable, transparent, and outcome-oriented.” It is refreshing to not only see a recommendation on moving to a risk-based security posture, but one that includes the importance of device configuration management and its importance in truly knowing your risk posture.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Avoid Posting a Breach FAQ




Yet another systems breach was reported last week, this time at the University of North Florida affecting 23,000+ students. This in and of itself is unfortunately nothing new, as we have been inundated weekly with reports of breeches occurring at organizations throughout the last 18 months. What struck a chord however with this incident at UNF is that it is not the first time that the college had experienced data loss from an external attacker. In October of 2010, the school was also attacked by an external hacker, and 107,000 students were affected in that incident. UNF has posted an FAQ on the latest attack here. One of the more interesting questions is what is the university doing to make sure this doesn’t happen again, with the school providing the following answer: “The method used by the intruder to gain access has been identified and steps have already been taken to prevent a reoccurrence. The University Police Department, in conjunction with Housing and ITS, is investigating this incident.”

Considering this is the second time the school has been attacked, one can imagine this response wasn’t too reassuring to the students. The incident also shows that the traditional reactive approach to security needs to be replaced by a proactive, risk-based approach. After the first incident in 2010, the school stated that “The university shut down the compromised server and has taken other precautions to prevent future incidents.” One can only assume that the specific exploit on the specific server that was compromised was patched against, or maybe a specific service blocked on the firewall. Reacting to that specific threat and assuming that the remediation actions taken protected the school moving forward clearly was not the most comprehensive approach to protect against future threats.

The most successful organizations that combat risk today “have a much better handle controlling what is deployed on their networks and whether these assets are vulnerable to imminent threats” as Jon Oltsik noted earlier this month on his blog. He also pointed out though that only 20% of organizations today have a risk management plan in place that includes some form of threat intelligence. FireMon has always believed it is important to proactively identify areas of Risk, whether they come from adding a rule to your firewall that inadvertently introduces risk by being overly permissive, or by identifying in real-time what assets on your network are most vulnerable to exploitation. With the release of Security Manager 6.0 with Risk Analyzer add-on, organizations now have a complete Security Posture Management tool that provides unparalleled visibility to understand the scope of business vulnerability and prioritize the proactive defense of critical assets, while maintaining a high confidence that their security infrastructure is free of human error or incompatibilities between policies and protection. Avoid having to post a breach FAQ; adopt a proactive risk based approach to security management today.

 

He Who Finds the Entry Point First Wins




The amount of news generated around attacks in 2011 has been overwhelming. In just the last week, the reports around SCADA based attacks have reached almost histrionic levels. Attacks on NASA, AT&T & VCU have all been highlighted this month as well. Despite the fact that companies will spend over $8 billion dollars on network security this year, hackers continue to successfully breach networks with an alarming regularity.

In an article on APT’s  posted on Dark Reading  yesterday, Sean Brady from RSA had an interesting quote. He said “Identifying the entry point — where an attacker got into a company’s network — is a key aspect of identifying and responding to an advanced attack”. At Firemon, we couldn’t agree more. However, we would also ask why wait until you’ve been attacked to discover the entry point? Why not proactively find the entry point yourself? As clearly indicated by the attack coverage we’ve seen in the press this year, the attackers are actively looking to find the entry point into your network even as you read this post.

Firemon’s new Risk Analyzer technology is designed to proactively find the entry point into your network that can be exploited. Risk Analyzer will also identify where an attacker can pivot off that access point, and what other resources within your network can be compromised. Risk Analyzer will also prioritize what patched vulnerabilities can reduce the greatest amount of risk with the least amount of effort, helping to focus your organization’s remediation efforts. Don’t be the last to discover the entry points that are exposed in your network; he who finds the entry point first wins.